Los Angeles Athletic Club v. Board of Harbor Commissioners
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GEARY, J., pro tem.
Appellant herein commenced its action against the above-named defendants to quiet its title to a leasehold estate derived from respondent City of Los Angeles; to remove a cloud from its title to said leasehold estate consisting of an order of respondent Board of Harbor Commissioners declaring appellant’s lease forfeited, and for declaratory relief. From the judgment of the trial court denying appellant the relief prayed for and quieting the title of the city against appellant the latter prosecutes this appeal.
Appellant herein is a California corporation with its principal…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Knight v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Worden v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Crawford v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Weller v. ChavarriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Ravettino v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Weisberg v. LoughridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People Ex Rel. Smith v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.