Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Smith v. City of San Jose

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 20, 1950No. Civ. 14545PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

In these proceedings in quo warranto to test the validity of the annexation of inhabited territory to the city of San Jose the defendants had judgment. The cause was tried on an agreed statement of facts and without any additional evidence. Findings of fact were made. They add nothing to the judgment as will appear hereafter. Accordingly the appeal presents questions of law alone and we may confine our discussion to two of these as they control the judgment.

The proceedings are taken under the Annexation Act of 1913 (2 Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 5159, Stats. 1913, p. 587) prior to its repeal in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Crawford v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Paganini v. Town of Corte MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. St. Louis-S. F. R. v. Choctaw County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Los Angeles Athletic Club v. Board of Harbor CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Township of Casco v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People Ex Rel. Southwest Exploration Co. v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Smith v. AyresSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Garcia v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Fillmore Twp v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API