Legal Opinion

State v. Seventeen Thousand and No/100 Dollars US Currency

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided June 18, 1991No. 13-90-477-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HINOJOSA, Justice.

The State of Texas and Kleberg County Sheriff Adan Munoz, Jr., appeal by two points of error from a summary judgment that the State take nothing in a forfeiture proceeding brought against $17,000 in U.S. currency seized and sought to be forfeited under the authority of the Texas Controlled Substances Act, 1 and that Sheriff Munoz return the money to Santiago Cantu, the real party in interest. We reverse and remand.

By its first point of error the State complains that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because, among other things, the State had no burden…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sakowitz, Inc. v. SteckTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Goldberg v. United States Shoe Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  3. Radelow-Gittens Real Property Management v. Pamex Foods, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  4. Lesbrookton, Inc. v. Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1990
  5. McCurry v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Padilla v. LaFranceTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Benavides v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
  3. Dallas Independent School District v. Finlan, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  4. Beiser v. Tomball Hospital Authority, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  5. Frias v. Atlantic Richfield Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API