Legal Opinion

Sakowitz, Inc. v. Steck

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1984No. C-2495PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff Diane Steck brought suit against Sakowitz, Inc. for tortious interference with the employment contract that Steck had with Oshman’s Sporting Goods, Inc. Steck sued because she was dismissed after the attorney for Sakowitz wrote Osh-man’s complaining that Oshman’s employment of Steck was a breach of Steck’s prior non-competition agreement with Sakowitz. The trial court granted Defendant Sakow-itz’s motion for summary judgment. The court of appeals reversed the judgment for Sakowitz and remanded the cause, holding that there were fact issues whether Sakow-itz acted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Black Lake Pipe Line Co. v. Union Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Martin v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Salado College v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Terry v. ZachryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Friendswood Development Co. v. McDade + Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Juliette Fowler Homes, Inc. v. Welch Associates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. BradyTexas Supreme Court · 1991

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API