Legal Opinion
Ruben ex rel. Ruben v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 3, 1991No. 89-103VPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDEWELT, Judge.
This is a child vaccine action brought pursuant to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l et seq. (West Supp.1990) (the Act). The Act establishes a program for payment of compensation for injuries or death caused by the administration of vaccines. Petitioners, Carl and Rachel Ruben, as parents and legal representatives of their 27-year-old son, Max S. Ruben, allege that their son suffered severe injuries from the administration of a DPT (diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus) vaccine inoculation. In a September 12, 1990,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Florsheim Shoe Company, Div. Of Interco, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- United States v. David H. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Bingham, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- First Charter Financial Corp., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Mona Bell Azure, A/K/A Helen Marie Bell Azure v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Garcia v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
- Stotts v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Smoot v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
- Red River Holdings, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Johnson v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.