Legal Opinion

Smoot v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided February 12, 2002No. 2390004PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANNUNZIATA, Judge.

Richard Anthony Smoot appeals his conviction for possession of marijuana while a prisoner, in violation of Code § 53.1-203. Smoot alleges: (1) the Commonwealth violated the provisions of the agreed order of discovery and inspection by not timely disclosing letters written by Smoot; and (2) because of this untimely disclosure, the trial court erred in overruling Smoot’s motion to dismiss or continue. For the following reasons, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Prior to Smoot’s trial for possession of marijuana by a prisoner, the trial court entered an agreed order for discovery and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Rusty's Welding Service, Inc. v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  5. Walker v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Garcia v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  2. Roe v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  3. Leitao v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
  4. Washington v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  5. Lampkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API