Legal Opinion

Bingham, Ltd. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 9, 1984No. 82-8588PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Circuit Judge:

Appellant (“Bingham”), a licensed manufacturer of small arms ammunition, see 18 U.S.C. § 921 et seq., appeals the district court’s denial of declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2201. The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court was correct in determining on a motion for summary judgment that the manufacturer of an exploding bullet which contains a canister of highly explosive lead azide must comply with the explosive licensing requirements of Title XI of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970, 18 U.S.C. §§ 841-847 (“OCCA” or “Act”). We have jurisdiction. 28…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Finisar Corp. v. DirecTV Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. NeradCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  3. Fredy D. Osorio v. State Farm Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Douglas L. Adams and Gary M. Piccirillo, Ronnie McKane v. Rodrick James, Henry Ziegler, Jr., Don Merritt, J.F. Tompkins, and Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Hudson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API