Legal Opinion
Stotts v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 4, 1991No. 89-108VPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:
Juanita and Joseph Stotts seek compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, codified as amended at 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (West Supp.1991) (the Program), for injuries sustained by their son Benjamin following the administration of the DPT vaccine on December 29, 1988.1 On Octo*355ber 11, 1990, Special Master Elizabeth R. Wright ordered the respondent to pay a substantial lump sum award out of the Program trust fund to compensate the petitioners for those vaccine-related injuries. From these “proceeds,” she ordered the respondent to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lonergan v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Ultimo v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- McClendon v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Cox v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Head v. Secretary of Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.