Legal Opinion
Rembold v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1952No. Civ. No. 14942PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a nonsuit.
The action is one for personal injuries sustained by appellant in a fall on a sidewalk in San Francisco.
The claim, required by law to be filed before suit, contains the statement that the accident occurred on 11. . . *796that certain street known as 18th Avenue, particularly the east sidewalk thereof near the intersection of the east side of 16th Avenue and the north side of Geary Boulevard; . . (Emphasis added.)
The motion for nonsuit was not based on any failure to prove that the sidewalk was defective or that the authorities had no…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Welch v. AlcottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Bloss v. RahillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. McLaughlin Land & Livestock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Palpar, Inc. v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sande v. SandeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Carew v. CarewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Goldsmith v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- O'MARA v. Council of the City of NewarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- De Castro & Co. v. Liberty Steamship of PanamaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.