Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. California State Board of Pharmacy

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1961No. Civ. 23679PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment which in effect discharged an alternative writ of mandate, denied a peremptory writ of mandate, and gave costs to the respondent, California State Board of Pharmacy, hereinafter referred to as the “Board.”

A résumé of some of the facts is as follows:

The appellant, prior to January 29, 1957, was licensed as a pharmacist, had a license in the firm name of “Medical Guild Pharmacy,” had a permit to sell hypodermics, syringes, needles, hypnotic drugs and a retailer’s permit to sell prophylactics. The premises from which appellant operated were located at 4747…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Rhode v. BartholomewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Wright v. MunroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. McNutt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Hay v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strode v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Collins v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Sica v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API