Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Wamsher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1990No. 1448PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

The Commonwealth appeals from an order dismissing burglary charges against appellee, Richard Edgar Wamsher, based upon the trial court’s determination that the Commonwealth had failed to exercise “due diligence” in bringing appellee to trial within 120 days of the withdrawal of appellee’s guilty plea, as required under the former version of Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100. We find that the run date under the new version of Rule 1100 was applicable in this case, and that it had not yet expired. We find alternatively that the Commonwealth had acted with “due diligence.” Consequently, we reverse.

F…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Roschen v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Commonwealth v. RevtaiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. In Re Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Com. v. Bowens, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Commonwealth v. BetzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. NesmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. GainesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API