Legal Opinion
Powell v. Stafford
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 8, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-B-2240PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Defendant J. Francis Stafford, Archbishop, the Archdiocese of Denver, a corporation sole (the Archdiocese), moves pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(c) to dismiss plaintiff Dennis Powell’s (Powell) complaint or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Because the parties present materials outside the plead ings to support their positions, the Archdiocese’s Rule 12(c) motion is treated as one for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. The motion is fully briefed and orally argued. Jurisdiction rests upon 28 U.S.C. § 1331. For all the reasons set…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jerome Otteson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Weishuhn v. Catholic Diocese of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Hartwig v. Albertus Magnus CollegeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Guinan v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of IndianapolisDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
- Abordo v. State of HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1995
- Bessard v. California Community CollegesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.