Legal Opinion

State v. Zwicker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1986No. 51708-8, 51713-4PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

In this consolidated case the State seeks direct review of the rulings of two superior courts, which held that evidence of refusal to take a Breathalyzer test is inadmissible as irrelevant, prejudicial or both in an action for driving while under the influence. We affirm.

Facts

Palanuik — On August 27, 1984, a Washington State Patrol trooper was advised by radio dispatch of a 2-car noninjury accident in Spokane County. The trooper responded to the call and upon arrival was advised by a Spokane County deputy sheriff that the defendant had an odor of alcohol on his breath and that there could be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. FrancoWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. City of Fircrest v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Gonzales v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. Whitman County District CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. BostromWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. BairdWashington Supreme Court · 2016

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API