State v. Schulze
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.
Michael Walter Schulze appeals his conviction on one count of vehicular homicide.1 We affirm.
Issues
Schulze raises several issues regarding the blood test mandated by RCW 46.20.308(3) when a driver is suspected of committing vehicular homicide while under the influence of or affected by intoxicating alcohol or drugs. These include: (1) whether Schulze had a CrR 3.1 or Const. art. 1, § 22 (amend. 10) right to counsel before submitting to the mandatory blood test; (2) whether RCW 46.20.308(3) permitted the testing of Schulze's blood for drugs; (3) whether the "special evidence warning" given to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. FjermestadWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. JudgeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ByrdWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BennettWashington Supreme Court · 2007
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.