Ayala v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.
The appellant, Western Casualty & Surety Company, contends that under the jury’s answers to the first question of the special verdict, gross negligence was established on the part of LaVern Metcalf, and that the trial court erred in not changing the answer to subdivision (d) of question 2 relating to the item of proximate cause in connection with the finding that Metcalf was negligent with respect to operating his automobile while intoxicated. Appellant submits that as a matter of law it is entitled to such change of answer, and maintains that it is entitled to a dismissal of the cross…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bentson v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Tomasik v. LanfermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- McNamer v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
- Kuchenreuther v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Hart v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Jacobs v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Wurtzinger v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Farmers MA Ins. Co. v. Milwaukee A. Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.