Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1953PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether the release executed in this instance by the injured party to one of two joint tort-feasors and the latter’s insurance carrier, precludes the insurance carrier of the second joint tortfeasor, who later had made a reasonable settlement with the injured person, from recovering contribution from the insurance carrier of the first joint tort-feasor.

Although the conception of the common law in most jurisdictions is to the contrary, the right to contribution between tort-feasors in Wisconsin, as in. a few other states, has been recognized as a common-law…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Ellis v. EssonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Ellis v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Ainsworth v. BergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Best v. YerkesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Glus v. G. C. Murphy Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. Globus, Inc. v. Law Research Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API