Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1961PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Presumably plaintiffs will attempt to establish that negligence of Flood was a cause of the minor plaintiffs’ injuries as alleged. If successful, plaintiffs will be entitled to judgment, against appellants, for their damages, reduced by one half by virtue of the provisions of the releases given to respondents Hooker and his insurer. (No contributory negligence was alleged.) In that event, appellants will not have to pay any more than if respondents had remained in the case and had remained liable for contribution. To the extent that appellants’ cross complaint was based on a claim for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. McDonnell Aircraft Corp. v. Hartman-Hanks-Walsh Painting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Ellis v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Martell v. KlingmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Pierringer v. HogerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Tucker v. MarcusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Degen v. BaymanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API