Davidov v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HAIGHT, Senior District Judge.
Petitioner Jora Davidov moves to quash subpoenas issued by respondent United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in the underlying investigation. Movant asserts that the Right to Financial Privacy Act (“RFPA” or “the Act”), 12 U.S.C. §§ 3401-3422, prohibits these subpoenas because there is no reason to believe the information sought is relevant to a legitimate law enforcement inquiry. The SEC opposes Davidov’s motion. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies the motion to quash and enforces the subpoenas.
I. THE RFPA
Co…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hancock v. MarshallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- Feiner v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Lerman v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Karlis v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
- ConstantinosDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. BivonaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023