Legal Opinion
Karlis v. United States Securities & Exchange Commission
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 8, 2009No. Miscellaneous Case 09-10107-NMGPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, District Judge.
Movant seeks reconsideration of her motion, brought pursuant to the customer challenge provisions of the Right to Financial Privacy Act (“the RFPA”), 12 U.S.C. § 3410, challenging a subpoena served by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“the SEC”) on her bank. This Court denied that motion without prejudice because the movant failed to submit (along with it) a sworn statement as required by statute. The movant has now submitted such a statement and moves for reconsideration of the order denying her motion.
I. Factual Background 1
This…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jerry T. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sandsend Financial Consultants, Ltd. v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Dawar v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Davidov v. United States Securities & Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
3Cited by1 opinion
- ConstantinosDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025