Legal Opinion
Constantinos
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided July 18, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00275Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 IN RE JURO SYSTEM, INC., Case No. 3:25-CV-00275-MMD-CLB 5 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS AND MOTION TO STRIKE 6 [ECF Nos. 1, 9] 7 8 Pending before the Court is Cosimo and Clarissa Constantinos’s (collectively 9 “Petitioners”) motion to quash subpoenas. (ECF No. 1.) On May 21, 2025, the Securities 10 Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued subpoenas to US Bank NA and Wells Fargo Bank 11 NA to obtain Petitioners’ personal banking records. (Id.) The motion to quash was filed 12 pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 3410(a). On June 30, 2025,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Martha Johnson and Delores J. Ceballos, Etc. v. University College of the University of Alabama in Birmingham George W. Campbell, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jerry T. O'Brien, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sandsend Financial Consultants, Ltd. v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.