Legal Opinion

Zuzan v. Shutrump

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 2003No. 03 MA 50PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vukovtch, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant John Zuzan appeals from the judgment of the Mahon-ing County Common Pleas Court that granted summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Richard Shutrump. The issue before us is whether the trial court erroneously determined as a matter of law that a cracked stoop on Shutrump’s property was an open-and-obvious danger that thereby relieved Shutrump from any duty to protect Zuzan from it. For the reasons provided below, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

{¶ 2} Zuzan and his helper, John Green, were installing carpet at the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Sidle v. HumphreyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Meijer Stores Ltd. Partnership, 07ap-201 (11-15-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Uhl v. Thomas, Ca2008-06-131 (1-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Solanki v. Doug Freshwater Contracting, Inc., 06-Je-39 (12-17-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Lilly v. Bradford Invest. Co., 06ap-1227 (6-7-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Boston v. A & B Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API