Zuzan v. Shutrump
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Vukovtch, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant John Zuzan appeals from the judgment of the Mahon-ing County Common Pleas Court that granted summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Richard Shutrump. The issue before us is whether the trial court erroneously determined as a matter of law that a cracked stoop on Shutrump’s property was an open-and-obvious danger that thereby relieved Shutrump from any duty to protect Zuzan from it. For the reasons provided below, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
{¶ 2} Zuzan and his helper, John Green, were installing carpet at the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2003
- Sidle v. HumphreyOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cooper v. Meijer Stores Ltd. Partnership, 07ap-201 (11-15-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Uhl v. Thomas, Ca2008-06-131 (1-20-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Solanki v. Doug Freshwater Contracting, Inc., 06-Je-39 (12-17-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Lilly v. Bradford Invest. Co., 06ap-1227 (6-7-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Boston v. A & B Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.