Legal Opinion
State v. McBride
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 30, 1943No. Nos. 33,337, 33,449PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Youngdahl, Justice.
Defendants McBride and Horrigan were convicted in municipal court of the offense of selling intoxicating liquor'without a license in violation of an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis. Although tried separately, this court made its order consolidating the two actions for purposes of appeal.
Defendant Horrigan, as president and treasurer of the National Drug Company, a corporation, managed a retail drugstore doing business under the tradename of the Federal Drug Company, which was owned by the corporation and located in the city of Minneapolis. The offices of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ross v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- State v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Overland Cotton Mill Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- Milbrath v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Kaufman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Duluth v. CervenySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- United States v. LaffalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Kiebach v. KiebachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- State v. LuxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.