State v. Lux
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment and sentence of the district court and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The legal issue raised by defendant is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain a verdict of guilty against him where he contends that there is no evidence that he directly committed the offense, but rather that the evidence merely shows that he is an officer of the corporation selling the seed involved.
Defendant assigns as error that the court erred in denying his motions (1) for a dismissal; (2) for a directed verdict; and (3) for a new…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ross v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- State v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Overland Cotton Mill Co. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
- Milbrath v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Kaufman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. MarkusonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State v. KlineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Blacketer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
- State v. PincusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.