Legal Opinion
Ausman v. EAGLE FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1968PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
This is an action on a policy of automobile liability insurance in which the plaintiff recovered a judgment for the sum of $15,963.70, interest and costs, against the defendant St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. St. Paul has appealed and plaintiff has cross-appealed.
The complaint, as- initially filed, contained a cause of action against Eagle Fire Insurance Company to recover $5,000 upon a policy of liability insurance issued by that company, but after the action was instituted Eagle paid the plaintiff $5,000 and the plaintiff dismissed his action against Eagle.
The facts, so far as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sparling v. Allstate Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Davy v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1952
- Central Surety & Insurance v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- American Employers' Insurance v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gowans v. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Allstate Insurance v. HandegardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Larson Construction Co. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969
- Allstate Insurance v. HandegardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Collins v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.