Legal Opinion
State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Hall
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided October 23, 1942PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Sims, Commissioner
Reversing.
This action is an aftermath of a fatal automobile accident wherein the driver of the car was protected by one automobile indemnity insurance company, and the owner of the car by another. The driver’s policy contained a provision insuring him while driving his own car and when driving another’s car on business or pleasure with the owner’s consent. The owner’s policy contained a similar provision protecting not only the owner but any other person driving his car on business or pleasure with his consent. The real purpose of this litigatión is to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Bradley v. Lehigh Valley R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Great American Indemnity Co. v. McMenaminCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- McCann v. Dixie Lake & Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. State Automobile Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United Services Automobile Association v. James B. RussomCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- American Surety Company of New York, and Cross-Appellee v. Canal Insurance Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. OtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
- Citizens Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Michigan Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Bolton v. ZieglerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.