Legal Opinion

American Employers' Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 1, 1944No. 3450PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, C. J.

The findings of fact are unquestionably warranted by the evidence. All exceptions thereto are overruled.

The Court could properly find not only that Bilodeau had authority to permit Cyr to take the 1940 car for trial purposes but that Towle knew and approved of what he had done. Towle testified that Bilodeau took the car on Saturday night with his permission to try to sell it to Cyr; that Bilodeau came to his house at two o’clock Sunday afternoon “to talk terms” with him “about selling the car to Mr. Cyr”; that he (Bilodeau) was then driving Cyr’s 1936 car; that he (Towle) informed Bilodeau of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. ChandlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  2. American Employers Insurance v. WentworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Protective Fire and Casualty Company v. CorneliusNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. De MaisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  3. Ray v. EarlDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Ausman v. EAGLE FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Lexington InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API