Legal Opinion

Central Surety & Insurance v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1935No. 25326. Department TwoPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Dilling-Vradenburg Organization, Inc., hereinafter spoken of as the Dilling company, engaged in subdividing and selling real property, and at all times herein mentioned carried automobile casualty insurance in its operations in this state, the insurance having been issued by the Central Surety and Insurance Corporation, a corporation.

Bessie Moore was employed by the Dilling company as a saleswoman, she using her own automobile; and at all times herein mentioned she carried automobile indemnity liability insurance issued by the London & Lancashire Indemnity Company of America, a corporation.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dahl v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Kibler v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Dahl v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. American Surety Company of New York, and Cross-Appellee v. Canal Insurance Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  2. Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Citizens Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Michigan Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  4. Rothman v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Safeco Insurance Co. of America, Inc. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API