Legal Opinion

State v. Hoyt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 2002No. WD 60239PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

Factual and Procedural History

This is an appeal taken by the State, under § 547.200, RSMo 2000, from a judgment suppressing the evidence seized from the respondent, a passenger in a motor vehicle, following a valid stop.

On the morning of February 2, 2001, Maryville police officer Darrell Shanks was on patrol when he observed a vehicle in which three individuals, including respondent, Michelle Hoyt, were riding. Upon passing Shanks’ patrol car, the individuals in the vehicle all physically turned around and stared at Shanks, prompting him to radio dispatch and run…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SlavinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. TackettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. WoolfolkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State v. WeddleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. SoltMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. RamiresMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. AbelnMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. NormanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. MosbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API