Legal Opinion
State v. Tackett
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 8, 2000No. WD 57545PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWIN H. SMITH, Judge.
The State appeals, pursuant to § 547.200.1(3), RSMo Supp.1997, 1 from the interlocutory order of the Circuit Court of Clay County suppressing evidence in this case, in which the respondent, Mike A. Tackett, stands charged with the class D felony of “creation of a controlled substance," in violation of § 195.420.
The State raises two points on appeal. It claims that the trial court erred in sustaining the respondent’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence, suppressing twelve boxes of Equate brand antihistamines seized in a search of a vehicle in which the respondent was a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. TaberMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. AgeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. TrenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. RowlandMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.