Legal Opinion
State v. Solt
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 2001No. 24104PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
The State appeals from the trial court’s order sustaining Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized from him after officers questioned and searched him during a bus stopover at the Greyhound bus terminal in Springfield.
Certain principles govern review of the trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress. The State has the burden of showing by a preponderance of evidence that the motion to suppress should be denied. § 542.296.6, RSMo 2000; State v. Wells, 33 S.W.3d 202, 205 (Mo.App.2000). Review of a ruling on a motion to suppress is limited to a determination of whether…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. WiseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- State v. MilliornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. GraysonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- State v. TaberMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. CromerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. FaulknerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. HoytMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.