Legal Opinion
State v. Woolfolk
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 17, 1999No. WD 55803PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAURA DENVIR STITH, Presiding Judge.
Defendant Carl Allan Woolfolk appeals his conviction of Possession of a Controlled Substance, in violation of § 195.202 RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to three years imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections. Execution of sentence was suspended, and Mr. Woolfolk was placed on five years supervised probation. On appeal, Mr. Woolfolk asserts error in denial of his motion to suppress the marijuana because: 1) the circumstances surrounding the traffic stop did not give rise to specific, articulable facts creating a reasonable suspicion that…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. BallardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BarksSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- State v. WeddleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. DeLaRosaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State of Missouri v. Charles A. Selvy, Jr.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.