Legal Opinion

Davies v. Ramsdell

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1919No. Civ. No. 2724PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in a suit to quiet title to certain real property in the county of Alameda. Defendant filed a motion to strike out parts of the complaint, which motion was denied; also a demurrer to the complaint, which was overruled; defendant then answered and judgment was given for the plaintiff upon a motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Instead of filing the ordinary short form of complaint to quiet title, plaintiff set up in the complaint in detail that the defendant executed a note and trust deed to evidence and se cure a loan of five thousand dollars…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Drew v. PedlarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Levins v. RovegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Heeser v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Turner v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Ganceart v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Perry v. MagnesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Palpar, Inc. v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Davies v. RamsdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Ass'n v. Hirsch Mercantile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API