Legal Opinion
Iacomacci v. Town of Trumbull
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 22, 1988No. 13365PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.
This is an appeal from a decision of the compensation review division affirming the workers’ compensation commissioner’s (commissioner) finding and award of dependent’s benefits to the plaintiff, Virginia Iacomacci, pursuant to General Statutes § 31-306 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (act). The award as affirmed was made subject to a “waiting period” as required by § 31-306 (i), which had been repealed at the time of the award to the plaintiff.2
The legislature repealed § 31-306 effective October 1, 1978. The sole issue on this appeal is whether the elimination of the waiting period by the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Hall v. Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Rana v. RitaccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Coley v. Camden Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Malatesta v. Mitsubishi Aircraft International, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.