Legal Opinion

Le Duc v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 4, 1977No. 1 CA-IC 1577PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

On this review the petitioner questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Commission’s finding which limited her loss of earning capacity to 39.26%. Precisely, is there any reasonable evidence that the petitioner can be employed as a restaurant hostess/cashier?

Petitioner, Aurora Le Due, while employed as a check-out cashier at the El Rancho Market, suffered a sprained back on March 7, 1974. Petitioner’s claim was accepted for workmen’s compensation benefits by the respondent carrier, Great American Insurance Co., and temporary compensation and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Germany v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  2. Dye v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Massie v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Sandoval v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Roach v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Boy v. Fremont Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Roach v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Tucson Steel Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  5. Arizona Dept. of Public Safety v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API