Legal Opinion

Massie v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1976No. 12109-PRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Justice.

The petitioner sought review of an award of the Industrial Commission denying recovery for medical and surgical expenses and post-surgical compensation. The Court of Appeals set aside the award, one judge dissenting. Massie v. Industrial Commission, 23 Ariz.App. 336, 533 P.2d 547 (1975). We granted review. The opinion of the Court of Appeals is vacated.

The petitioner sustained an injury in an industrially related accident while working for Duval Sierrita Corporation, a self-insured employer. He filed a claim for Workmen’s Compensation benefits. Medical benefits were paid…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wammack v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Talley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Kelsey v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Davis v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Pedigo v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Le Duc v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Western Cable v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. Sandoval v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Cementation Co. of America, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Perez v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API