Legal Opinion
Sandoval v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 9, 1976No. 1 CA-IC 1498PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Acting Presiding Judge.
On review of this Workmen’s Compensation award several issues are presented: (1) Is the Notice of Claim Status void because the form contained printed language which stated that the employee “has returned to regular work without wage loss due to injury” 1 which inaccurately described the claimant’s actual situation? (2) Is the Industrial Commission’s determination that the petitioner’s condition was stationary in August, 1973, supported by the evidence? (3) Is the Notice of Claim Status void because of a four-month delay between its issuance and its…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Auxier v. Woodward State Hospital-SchoolSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Sandoval v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Le Duc v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Horizon Resources Bethany Ltd. v. Cutco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994