Legal Opinion

Roach v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1983No. 16380-PRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

Garold D. Roach (claimant) was injured in an industrial accident on November 30, 1978. An Industrial Commission award was affirmed by the court of appeals in a memorandum decision. (No. 1 CA-IC 2673, filed October 6, 1982.) The claimant now petitions this court for review, challenging the sufficiency of the award. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5, and Ariz.R.Civ.App.P. 23,17A A.R.S. The issue presented for review is whether the findings of the Commission with respect to reduction of earning capacity are supported by substantial evidence. We hold that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Allen v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Adkins v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Davis v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Zimmerman v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Sproul v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hoppin v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. Madison Granite Co. v. INDUS. COM'N OF ARIZ.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. W.F. Dunn, Sr. & Son v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. Roach v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API