Legal Opinion
Hagar v. Elite Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 28, 1971No. Civ. 38292PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, J.
Plaintiff Hagar’s complaint in declaratory relief alleged that he was protected by uninsured motorist coverage under defendant’s insurance policy within the meaning of section 11580.2 of the Insurance Code. Defendant, Elite Insurance Company, answered that plaintiff had agreed to delete uninsured motorist coverage in his application for insurance. The court found that Hagar signed an application containing a provision deleting such coverage, that he “examined and retained” the policy, that the policy contained no premium charge for uninsured motorist coverage, and that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Eliopulos v. North River InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Kincer v. Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Pechtel v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. StevenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnson v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Bauman v. Islay InvestmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Dufresne v. Elite Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Enterprise Insurance v. MulleagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Rankin v. West American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.