Legal Opinion

Enterprise Insurance v. Mulleague

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1987No. C000282PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPARKS, J.

In this case we consider the statutory limits on uninsured motorist coverage. The issue turns on the proper construction of Insurance Code section 11580.2, subdivisions (a) and (m). We also address the question whether a statement of decision under Code of Civil Procedure section 632 is required when only an issue of law is tendered to the court in a bench trial.

Defendant Bernard James Mulleague claimed uninsured motorist benefits under a policy of insurance issued by plaintiff Enterprise Insurance Company (Enterprise). When the parties could not agree on the applicable…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Johansen v. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance BureauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Samson v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Insurance of North America v. Sam Harris Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Turner v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Johnston v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Coachella v. Riverside County Airport Land Use CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Ahern v. DillenbackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Palm v. SchillingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Utah Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. San Francisco Unified School District v. San Francisco Classroom Teachers Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API