Legal Opinion

Bonhotel v. Bonhotel

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 31, 2001No. AC 20526PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LANDAU, J.

The defendant, Nancy Bonhotel, appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying the defendant’s postdissolution motion.1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) determined that the plaintiff, Earl Bonhotel, was not responsible for certain expenses related to the postmajority education of the parties’ children, including room and board when college sponsored housing was unavailable, and he had not been consulted about the children’s education,2 (2) *563applied the best interest of the child standard to the question of postmajority education and (3) denied the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Issler v. IsslerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Raph v. VogelerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  4. Legg v. LeggConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  5. Sablosky v. SabloskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Berglass v. BerglassConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Sheppard v. SheppardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Sablosky v. SabloskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. Bonhotel v. BonhotelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Bonhotel v. Bonhotel, No. Fa 91 55322s (Aug. 28, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API