Legal Opinion

Sablosky v. Sablosky

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 17, 2002No. AC 19261PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

This case returns to this court on remand from our Supreme Court pursuant to its decision in Sablosky v. Sablosky, 258 Conn. 713, 784 A.2d 890 *410(2001). In reversing the prior decision of this court,2 our Supreme Court held that (1) an ambiguity in the terms of a judgment does not, as a matter of law, preclude a finding of contempt for wilfully failing to comply with certain provisions of the dissolution judgment and (2) a court, when concluding that a finding of contempt is unwarranted on the basis of an ambiguity in the judgment, may nonetheless enter an appropriate order of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Barnard v. BarnardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. L. F. Pace & Sons, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  4. Connecticut National Bank v. VoogSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Briggs v. BriggsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. Kasowitz v. KasowitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Lombardi v. Lombardi, No. Fa 86 0081026 S (Dec. 31, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API