Legal Opinion

Kanarek v. Bugliosi

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 17, 1980No. Civ. 56558PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, J.

On this appeal we consider the propriety of an order sustaining without leave to amend the demurrer to a complaint on the ground that the action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Plaintiff, Irving A. Kanarek, has appealed from the order dismissing his action following the sustaining of that demurrer. The action concerns allegedly libelous statements made by defendant, Vincent T. Bugliosi, concerning plaintiff, in defendant’s book, “Helter Skelter.” Codefendants are the coauthor and publishers of that book.

I

A brief history of the events leading up to this litigation is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gregoire v. G. P. Putnam's SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Levy v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Goddard v. Security Title Insurance & Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Forsher v. BugliosiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Charles Yeager v. Connie BowlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Cusano v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Shively v. BozanichCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Fleury v. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Christoff v. Nestle USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API