Legal Opinion
Palomar Mobilehome Park Association v. City of San Marcos
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 30, 1993No. 91-56165PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
Palomar Mobilehome Park Association (“Palomar”) filed suit in federal court, challenging the City of San Marcos’s (“City”) mobilehome park rent control ordinance. The district court dismissed the case because it was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331(a) and 1343(3). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
FACTS
On September 14, 1989, Palomar filed a complaint in the San Diego Superior Court, challenging the City’s rent control ordinance. The City filed a general demurrer to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Alabama BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. v. Crest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Dlx, Inc. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Thomas Dodd and Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Dubinka v. Judges of the Superior Court of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Dubinka v. Judges of Superior Court of State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.