Legal Opinion
Robert C. Buell & Co. v. Danaher
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 7, 1941PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElls, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court confirming the action of the administrator of the unemployment compensation law in assessing the plaintiff because of certain salesmen claimed to be its employees, and the question involved is whether they are servants of the plaintiff as that term is used in the Unemployment Compensation Act.
The material facts found by the trial court are as follows: The plaintiff is a partnership engaged in a brokerage business in securities. It does not buy or sell for its own account. It maintains an office in Hartford where it employs bookkeepers,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Norwalk Gaslight Co. v. Borough of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Beaverdale Memorial Park, Inc. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. ToneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Jack and Jill, Inc. v. ToneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- A. J. Meyer & Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Rozran v. DurkinIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
- Latimer v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Commonwealth v. Hecker & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Ross v. Post Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.