Legal Opinion
Latimer v. Administrator
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 14, 1990No. 13863PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.
This is an appeal from an assessment by the defendant administrator1 of the Connecticut Unemployment Compensation Act pursuant to General Statutes § 31-2702 for unpaid contributions allegedly *239due under the act from the plaintiff, Walter N. Latimer. The assessment was based on a determination by the administrator that the plaintiff was the employer, within the meaning of General Statutes § 31-222 (a) (1) (B) (ii), of certain individuals who rendered services to him in his home during the first two calendar quarters of 1987.3 The plaintiff claimed, to the contrary, that the subject individuals…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Norwalk Gaslight Co. v. Borough of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Thompson v. TwissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Hartley v. Red Ball Transit Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Pepe v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Beaverdale Memorial Park, Inc. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Mattatuck Museum-Mattatuck Historical Society v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Tianti v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.