Legal Opinion
United Metal Products Corporation v. National Bank of Detroit
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1987No. 85-2004PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s adverse decision in this declaratory judgment action. The issue below and on appeal is whether we should create an implied exception to the anti-alienation provisions of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1056(d), and the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 401(a)(13), and allow an employer to garnish an employee’s pension or profit sharing fund when that employee commits fraud against the employer. The trial court declined to do so. We agree and therefore affirm.
Plaintiff United Metal Products maintains a profit sharing plan for the benefit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- General Motors Corporation v. David J. Buha and James B. Stone, County District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- St. Paul Fire And Marine Insurance Co. v. H. Ray CoxCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Vink v. SHV North America Holding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Jim L. Woolsey v. Marion Laboratories, Inc. Marion Laboratories, Inc., Profit Sharing PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- In Re KometUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1989
- In Re MessingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
- In Re BarnesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.