Legal Opinion
In Re Barnes
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 6, 2001No. 19-40665PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND OPINION REGARDING OBJECTION TO EXEMPTION IN DEBTOR’S TIAA AND CREF ACCOUNTS
ARTHUR J. SPECTOR, Chief Judge.
This contested matter arose upon the filing of an objection by Colleen Corcoran, the chapter 7 trustee, to the Debtor’s claim that her interest in certain annuity contracts was exempt. Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 52(a) (incorporated by F.R.Bankr.P. 9014 and 7052), the Court now issues its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. For the reasons set forth hereafter, the Court holds that only one of the two interests at issue constitutes property of the…
2Cases cited105 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- MacKey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rhiel v. Adams (In Re Adams)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Colish v. United States (In Re Colish)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- In re WestUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Rhiel v. OhioHealth Corp. (In Re Hunter)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- In Re WilliamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.