Legal Opinion
Vink v. SHV North America Holding Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 8, 1982No. 80 Civ. 2366 (RLC)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
This case involves a faithless employee who is seeking the protection of the law to force his former employer to remain faithful in its pension obligations to him. The plaintiff, Nicholas Vink, appearing pro se, has brought suit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., to compel the defendants, SHV North America Holding Corporation (“SHV”), his former employer, and Leo Wiest, trustee of SHV’s pension plan, to pay him the pension benefits that he asserts are due him. SHV has refused to make pension…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Stone v. StoneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Guidry v. Sheet Metal Workers National Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re KometUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1989
- Paul Nash v. Trustees of Boston UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United Metal Products Corporation v. National Bank of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Kann v. Keystone Resources, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.