Raisch v. M. K. & T. Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.
The court sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff’s second amended complaint, and upon the plaintiff declining further to amend judgment was entered for defendant. This appeal is prosecuted from the judgment, and the plaintiff claims that the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer thereto.
The facts necessary to an understanding of the question to be decided may be briefly stated as follows: The defendant is a corporation duly organized and having a board of five directors, which, during the times the acts complained…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thompson v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Herbert Kraft Co. Bank v. Bank of OrlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Ruck v. Caledonia Silver Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richman v. Bank of PerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- C. B. Nash Co. v. City of Council BluffsU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1909
- Cheney v. CanfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Lippman v. Kehoe Stenograph Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1918
- Stivers v. Sidney Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.