Herbert Kraft Co. Bank v. Bank of Orland
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This is an appeal from the judgment, for the purpose of reviewing the order sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the amended complaint.
It is alleged that one W. R. Hall, being indebted to one Kraft in the sum of three thousand dollars, on or about-the twenty-sixth day of January, 1896, caused to be issued to said Kraft, to secure the said indebtedness, a certificate of seventy shares of the capital stock of defendant bank, and that, thereafter, to further secure the said sum, said Hall assigned to said Kraft thirty additional shares of said capital stock. The said stock was of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Telegraph Co. v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kohler v. AgassizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Dewing v. PerdicariesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pratt v. Taunton Copper Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- San Bernardino Investment Co. v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Schneider v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Richman v. Bank of PerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Cheney v. CanfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Seyberth v. American Commander Mining & Milling Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Stivers v. Sidney Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.